| 
         
        | 
       
         
          
          
         "Barbara 
              McClintock taught me a great deal about how to do good research, 
              how to evaluate evidence, and how not to fall into traps. One lesson 
              came from a trap she herself almost fell into. Most of her actual 
              observations were made from colored spots on the corn kernels, which 
              told her a great deal. And one day she called me and said I should 
              see what she had. She showed me this ear of corn with these purple 
              spots and asked me what I saw. And I said, 'Spots, nothing special.' 
              And she said, 'Don't you see that they're paired?' I looked again, 
              and suddenly I could see that there were two small ones and two 
              big ones. And I asked her what that meant, and she said she wasn't 
              sure, but she thought it was important. She left, and about ten 
              minutes later she called, and told me to forget it!
          
         
        
        
         "She tested herself and found that it's very easy to see pairs 
              in random spots as long as there's no restriction on the distance 
              between them. So if you have a lot of random spots of different 
              sizes and you think pairs, you just see them. So she thought she 
              had seen a specific pattern but immediately realized that it was 
              a trap.
          
          
         "McClintock had this amazing mastery of her material. She knew 
              every little wrinkle of her maize plant, every chromosome, every 
              gene that she could know at that point. She had an ability to plan 
              her experiments as if she was almost physically manipulating the 
              chromosomes. She had that kind of deep knowledge of what was going 
              on.
          
          
         "She had an ingenuity in planning that was extraordinary. If 
              she had something she wanted to know, she found a way to get that 
              organism to tell her about it. She also had a degree of rigor that 
              kept her from going beyond what she could really conclude about 
              her data. It kept her from reaching conclusions until she was absolutely 
              sure. She didn't publish her major work until years after she had 
              made her discovery."
         
        
          
         
        
         
          more 
              dispatches »
         
         
        | 
       
         
        |