| 
             
              
                
              
              | 
             
            
             | 
               
              | 
             
              
               © 
                        Per Olof Hulth
              
              | 
             
            
             | 
               
              | 
             
              
               Checking 
                        the list to make sure everything is in order.
              
              | 
             
            
             | 
               
              | 
             
              
              
              | 
             
            
           
             
             
            
             
              A 
                    literary essay about AMANDA by Francis Halzen
               
              page 2
             
            
            
           
            
             The 
                    end result, abstracted on a computer screen, would have seemed 
                    unremarkable to most people. But to us it was the sole trace 
                    of a particle that had traversed vast distances to reach us, 
                    perhaps a remnant of one of the most spectacular events in 
                    the universe. More to the point, it was the first concrete 
                    proof that AMANDA workedthat it could help map the distant 
                    depths of space, thereby perhaps resolving some of the most 
                    heated controversies in physics. Later, when I E-mailed the 
                    diagram to our collaborators, one of them wrote back: "This 
                    is why Ive spent five years of my life on this project."
              
              
             "NEUTRINOS, THEY ARE VERY SMALL," John Updike wrote, 
                    famously. "They have no charge and have no mass / And 
                    do not interact at all." As it turns out, Updike was 
                    wrong on two counts, but he got the spirit right, anyway. 
                    Neutrinos are so small and slippery that they pass through 
                    the Earth (and stars and cities and most everything else) 
                    like a bullet through a rainstorm. Unfazed by magnetic fields 
                    or the strong nuclear force, they have to make a direct hit 
                    on a proton to be stopped at alla highly unlikely event. 
                    At the same time, neutrinos are about as plentiful in the 
                    universe as the photons that constitute light: 3 x 1016 of 
                    them pass through our bodies every second.
              
              
             That combination of factors makes neutrinos the best focus 
                    for deep-space astronomy. Most photons cannot reach us from 
                    the most distant points in the universe (the most energetic 
                    ones cannot even make it from the edge of the galaxy: they 
                    crash into microwave background radiation along the way). 
                    And though radio waves routinely travel as far as neutrinos, 
                    they are emitted even by rather mundane astronomical objectsthe 
                    moon, for instance. Neutrinos, on the other hand, not only 
                    travel long distances, they are easy to categorize: low-energy 
                    neutrinos are generated by the sun, by cosmic-ray collisions 
                    in the upper atmosphere, and by other nearby phenomena; high-energy 
                    neutrinos only reach the earth from distant, supremely violent 
                    eventsgamma-ray bursts, for instance, or black holes 
                    at the center of new galaxies. By focusing on high-energy 
                    neutrinos alone, a telescope can naturally filter out all 
                    but the most interesting things in the sky.
              
              
             But there is no free lunch. If neutrinos can fly through planets 
                    without stopping, they hardly brake for your average telescope 
                    mirror. In fact, neutrinos are so hard to detect that for 
                    decades they existed only in theory. The Swiss theoretical 
                    physicist Wolfgang Pauli "invented" them in 1930 
                    to balance out the energy apparently lost when radioactive 
                    matter decays. ("I have done a terrible thing," 
                    he told the German astronomer Walter Baade. "I have postulated 
                    a particle that cannot be detected.") It was not until 
                    twenty-six years later, when the physicists Frederick Reines 
                    and Clyde L. Cowan built a neutrino detector near the Savannah 
                    River nuclear plant in South Carolina, that the existence 
                    of the particle was confirmed.
            
             
            
           
           |